Ну и про Гудвина с Эрнестом. Точнее не про них, а про то, что Ёжик рассказывает пять копеек надо вставить. Ёжик нашла единственно верный путь в своей ситуации, но часть того, что она рассказывает падает тенью не только на разных Пузiков, но и на куда как более достойных людей.
Ну и про Гудвина с Эрнестом. Точнее не про них, а про то, что Ёжик рассказывает пять копеек надо вставить. Ёжик нашла единственно верный путь в своей ситуации, но часть того, что она рассказывает падает тенью не только на разных Пузiков, но и на куда как более достойных людей.
BY Дикая Тварь из Дикого Поля
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ca
