Сегодня утром волонтёры приехали в заповедник, где вчера выпускали птиц с фермы «Аристей».
Бо́льшая птиц плавает в воде, но на берегу волонтёры нашли порядка десяти погибших птиц.
Кроме того, вчера во время переброса птиц в заповедник их должны были сопровождать орнитологи. Волонтёры, которые следовали за грузовиками с птицами, сообщают, что орнитологов на месте всё же не было.
Сегодня утром волонтёры приехали в заповедник, где вчера выпускали птиц с фермы «Аристей».
Бо́льшая птиц плавает в воде, но на берегу волонтёры нашли порядка десяти погибших птиц.
Кроме того, вчера во время переброса птиц в заповедник их должны были сопровождать орнитологи. Волонтёры, которые следовали за грузовиками с птицами, сообщают, что орнитологов на месте всё же не было.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ca
