Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 16419 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 اندیشه سرا | Telegram Webview: andishehsarapub/5705 -
🚨 لطفا تصاویر این پیام را با پیام قبل مقایسه کنید تا گوشهای از ماهیت فضای مجازی فارسی برایتان روشن شود. این یک نمونهی ساده است، نمونههای ساده و پیچیده فراوانند. 👈ویرگول نباشیم @andishehsarapub #آسیب_شناسی_جامعه_مجازی
🚨 لطفا تصاویر این پیام را با پیام قبل مقایسه کنید تا گوشهای از ماهیت فضای مجازی فارسی برایتان روشن شود. این یک نمونهی ساده است، نمونههای ساده و پیچیده فراوانند. 👈ویرگول نباشیم @andishehsarapub #آسیب_شناسی_جامعه_مجازی
The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from ca