Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].

Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses

Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ @AntiModernVersions



group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401
Create:
Last Update:

Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].

Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses

Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ @AntiModernVersions

BY 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 β„Œπ”’π”Ÿπ”―π”’π”΄ β„œπ”¬π”¬π”±π”°







Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were uglyβ€”and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuableβ€”and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had β€œno plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently β€œincompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Telegram has gained a reputation as the β€œsecure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, β€œWhat exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from ca


Telegram 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 β„Œπ”’π”Ÿπ”―π”’π”΄ β„œπ”¬π”¬π”±π”°
FROM American