Результаты визита Мишустина в Китай - очень хорошие. Огромные совместные инвестиции и развязывание нескольких узелков. Преемственности не потребуется. Мишустин остается премьером. Решать, конечно, Президенту Путину, но все сигналы об этом и третья встреча Мишустина с Председателем Си за год - это один из самых серьезных.
Результаты визита Мишустина в Китай - очень хорошие. Огромные совместные инвестиции и развязывание нескольких узелков. Преемственности не потребуется. Мишустин остается премьером. Решать, конечно, Президенту Путину, но все сигналы об этом и третья встреча Мишустина с Председателем Си за год - это один из самых серьезных.
BY БОЛЬШОЙ ТРАНСФЕР
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ca
