В Ираке боевики проиранской группировки вновь нанесли удар БПЛА-камикадзе по используемой ВС США воинской части "Айн Аль-Асад" в иракской провинции Анбар. Видеозапись с запуском дрона Qasef-2 появилась на ресурсах вооруженного формирования. Также группировка заявила об ударе двумя беспилотниками по американскому гарнизону неподалеку от г. Эрбиль.
Пентагон информацию об инцидентах пока никак не комментировал.
В Ираке боевики проиранской группировки вновь нанесли удар БПЛА-камикадзе по используемой ВС США воинской части "Айн Аль-Асад" в иракской провинции Анбар. Видеозапись с запуском дрона Qasef-2 появилась на ресурсах вооруженного формирования. Также группировка заявила об ударе двумя беспилотниками по американскому гарнизону неподалеку от г. Эрбиль.
Пентагон информацию об инцидентах пока никак не комментировал.
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from ca
