У коллектив криптоканала лишь один вопрос к написавшей публичныйдонос на на блогера Даню Милохина главеЛиги безопасного интернета ЕкатеринеМизулиной:
Екатерина Михайловна, а откуда у вас доступ к личному делу Милохина?
Если бы подобная информация появилась в каком-нибудь СМИ, она бы стала основанием для возбуждения дела из-за нарушения закона о персональных данных. Возбудят ли дело на Мизулину-младшую? Вопрос риторический, уважаемые читатели.
У коллектив криптоканала лишь один вопрос к написавшей публичныйдонос на на блогера Даню Милохина главеЛиги безопасного интернета ЕкатеринеМизулиной:
Екатерина Михайловна, а откуда у вас доступ к личному делу Милохина?
Если бы подобная информация появилась в каком-нибудь СМИ, она бы стала основанием для возбуждения дела из-за нарушения закона о персональных данных. Возбудят ли дело на Мизулину-младшую? Вопрос риторический, уважаемые читатели.
Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from ca
