☕️В деле генерала МВД Александра Мельникова есть одна странная особенность, которая не дает покоя правильным юристам. Фабула дела о вымогательстве 100 млн руб больше похожа на получение взятки, а не на мошенничество. Разница между двумя статьями 9 лет колонии строгого режима (наказание по ст 159 УК РФ 6 лет, а по ст 290 УК РФ - 15 лет). Дело генерала МВД пытались смягчить, суд сперва взял отсрочку в 72 часа, но после утечки в СМИ полицейский министр не стал рисковать и передал своего товарища в руки правосудия.
☕️В деле генерала МВД Александра Мельникова есть одна странная особенность, которая не дает покоя правильным юристам. Фабула дела о вымогательстве 100 млн руб больше похожа на получение взятки, а не на мошенничество. Разница между двумя статьями 9 лет колонии строгого режима (наказание по ст 159 УК РФ 6 лет, а по ст 290 УК РФ - 15 лет). Дело генерала МВД пытались смягчить, суд сперва взял отсрочку в 72 часа, но после утечки в СМИ полицейский министр не стал рисковать и передал своего товарища в руки правосудия.
BY Хороший
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from ca
