Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 481 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8673 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 سایت خبری-تحلیلی کلمه | Telegram Webview: kaleme/31936 -
عباس پالیزدار، (عضو هیئت تحقیق و تفحص مجلس هفتم) می‌گوید خلاصه‌ای از ۵۴ هزار صفحه سند درباره فساد اقتصادی مسئولان را در ۱۸۳ صفحه به علی خامنه‌ای و رئیس دولت وقت (محمود احمدی‌نژاد) و سایر رؤسای قوا داده و به نتیجه نرسیده است. او تاکید می‌کند که «زندانیان سال ۸۸ مشکل‌شان سیاسی بود نه فساد»، اما علیرغم اعتراف به فساد ساختاری در کشور، به جانشینی مجتبی خامنه‌ای امید بسته است! این ویدئو گزیده‌ای از گفت‌وگوی دیده‌بان ایران با پالیزدار است که بیش از یکماه و نیم پیش ضبط شده و به تازگی منتشر شده است.
عباس پالیزدار، (عضو هیئت تحقیق و تفحص مجلس هفتم) می‌گوید خلاصه‌ای از ۵۴ هزار صفحه سند درباره فساد اقتصادی مسئولان را در ۱۸۳ صفحه به علی خامنه‌ای و رئیس دولت وقت (محمود احمدی‌نژاد) و سایر رؤسای قوا داده و به نتیجه نرسیده است. او تاکید می‌کند که «زندانیان سال ۸۸ مشکل‌شان سیاسی بود نه فساد»، اما علیرغم اعتراف به فساد ساختاری در کشور، به جانشینی مجتبی خامنه‌ای امید بسته است! این ویدئو گزیده‌ای از گفت‌وگوی دیده‌بان ایران با پالیزدار است که بیش از یکماه و نیم پیش ضبط شده و به تازگی منتشر شده است.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted.
from ca
