🍌 Если вы думаете, что зря ходите на работу и тратите драгоценные часы своей бесценной жизни, скорее всего так и есть - банан, приклеенный скотчем к стене, был успешно продан за $5,2 млн на аукционе Sotheby’s. В пересчете на курс это 626 451 100 рублей. А если добавить комиссию площадки и прочие платежи - общая сумма превысила $6 млн. Живите теперь с этой информацией.
🍌 Если вы думаете, что зря ходите на работу и тратите драгоценные часы своей бесценной жизни, скорее всего так и есть - банан, приклеенный скотчем к стене, был успешно продан за $5,2 млн на аукционе Sotheby’s. В пересчете на курс это 626 451 100 рублей. А если добавить комиссию площадки и прочие платежи - общая сумма превысила $6 млн. Живите теперь с этой информацией.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram was founded in 2013 by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from ca
