В Бресте судили гражданина России по статье о шпионаже; приговор неизвестен
Дмитрий Шлетгауэр — уроженец российского Славгорода, c 2018 года у него беларуский ВНЖ, сообщили «Медиазоне» в организации BELPOL. Он работал в Каменце на предприятии по производству полимерной продукции и упаковки.
В Бресте судили гражданина России по статье о шпионаже; приговор неизвестен
Дмитрий Шлетгауэр — уроженец российского Славгорода, c 2018 года у него беларуский ВНЖ, сообщили «Медиазоне» в организации BELPOL. Он работал в Каменце на предприятии по производству полимерной продукции и упаковки.
Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The perpetrators use various names to carry out the investment scams. They may also impersonate or clone licensed capital market intermediaries by using the names, logos, credentials, websites and other details of the legitimate entities to promote the illegal schemes. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ca
