Ученые из УниверситетаДжонса Хопкинса разработали такую систему и уже провели первуюуспешную операцию.
Теперь робот может с точностью, сопоставимой снастоящим врачом, выполнять сложные процедуры, просто посмотреввидеокурс.
Команда использовала имитационное обучение, позволяющеероботу быть более автономным, точно манипулировать иглой и накладывать швы. И даже еслипроизойдет сбой, он сможет приспособиться и продолжить операцию.
Ученые из УниверситетаДжонса Хопкинса разработали такую систему и уже провели первуюуспешную операцию.
Теперь робот может с точностью, сопоставимой снастоящим врачом, выполнять сложные процедуры, просто посмотреввидеокурс.
Команда использовала имитационное обучение, позволяющеероботу быть более автономным, точно манипулировать иглой и накладывать швы. И даже еслипроизойдет сбой, он сможет приспособиться и продолжить операцию.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from ca
