“У меня ж кредиты»,«Противостоять беспределу не для меня”.
Частенько, закредитованные люди успешно заглушают свою совесть вот этими удобными для себя доводами. Да и для некоторых работодателей это рабство в помощь. Можно заставлять сотрудника выполнить любой приказ. Пусть все люди, будут свободны от этой кабалы, и в состоянии препятствовать этому.
“У меня ж кредиты»,«Противостоять беспределу не для меня”.
Частенько, закредитованные люди успешно заглушают свою совесть вот этими удобными для себя доводами. Да и для некоторых работодателей это рабство в помощь. Можно заставлять сотрудника выполнить любой приказ. Пусть все люди, будут свободны от этой кабалы, и в состоянии препятствовать этому.
BY "Новое дело"
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ca
