Депутат Госдумы и член Совета Самарской Русской Общины Михаил Матвеев:
"Тяжёлые времена всегда призывают русский народ к объединению. И наша естественная опора – это Русская Православная Церковь, с системой приходов и монастырей. И Русская Община как институт объединения.
На прошедшем Всемирном русском народном соборе, в его резолюции, в его наказе, прозвучала поддержка деятельности Русской Общины. Сегодняшнее благословение Святейшего Патриарха лишний раз говорит о том, что у нас есть более серьёзная опора, чем какие-то политические институты или что-то преходящее".
Депутат Госдумы и член Совета Самарской Русской Общины Михаил Матвеев:
"Тяжёлые времена всегда призывают русский народ к объединению. И наша естественная опора – это Русская Православная Церковь, с системой приходов и монастырей. И Русская Община как институт объединения.
На прошедшем Всемирном русском народном соборе, в его резолюции, в его наказе, прозвучала поддержка деятельности Русской Общины. Сегодняшнее благословение Святейшего Патриарха лишний раз говорит о том, что у нас есть более серьёзная опора, чем какие-то политические институты или что-то преходящее".
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from ca
