Продолжаем люпенизацию канала с Сережей Сергиенко: сегодня в сокровищнице жанра сёнэн снова все перепутали — и речь пойдет о сэйнэне «Женщина по имени Фудзико Минэ», самой нетипичной части юношеской франшизы «Люпен III».
Эффектное аниме от TMS Entertainment («Корзинка фруктов», «Доктор Стоун»), ломающее ожидания и сочиненное преимущественно женщинами (но без Юасы, не смейтесь, не обошлось!).
Продолжаем люпенизацию канала с Сережей Сергиенко: сегодня в сокровищнице жанра сёнэн снова все перепутали — и речь пойдет о сэйнэне «Женщина по имени Фудзико Минэ», самой нетипичной части юношеской франшизы «Люпен III».
Эффектное аниме от TMS Entertainment («Корзинка фруктов», «Доктор Стоун»), ломающее ожидания и сочиненное преимущественно женщинами (но без Юасы, не смейтесь, не обошлось!).
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from ca
