Некурящие в нашем цехе иногда завидуют даже мертвым и тут, увы, против древних традиций завода не попрешь.
«Прилягу на пару минут покемарить, пока вы табачите…» - бубнит сквозь усы Степан Ебудашечкин.
Дружище, ты давай, сильно не растекайся по станку, пока мы гагочем в курилке, как полоумные гиены в приступе голода. Все знают, что кто не курит - тот хуярит, без малейшего права увидеть свет божий.
Таковы устои долбильни, и ни я эти карты раскладывал, так что зла не держи, мой юный друг.
Некурящие в нашем цехе иногда завидуют даже мертвым и тут, увы, против древних традиций завода не попрешь.
«Прилягу на пару минут покемарить, пока вы табачите…» - бубнит сквозь усы Степан Ебудашечкин.
Дружище, ты давай, сильно не растекайся по станку, пока мы гагочем в курилке, как полоумные гиены в приступе голода. Все знают, что кто не курит - тот хуярит, без малейшего права увидеть свет божий.
Таковы устои долбильни, и ни я эти карты раскладывал, так что зла не держи, мой юный друг.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from ca
