🐱 Не споря с тем, что причины сирийского кризиса выходят далеко за рамки коварного плана американцев и израильтян, о чём я сам писал и говорил немало за эти дни, тем не менее, сложно опровергнуть факты. Сразу после начала переброски подразделений "Хизбаллы" из Ливана в Сирию Израиль начал наносить по ним воздушные удары, объясняя это неким пуском ракеты по территории Израиля со стороны "Хизбаллы". Конечно, это можно объяснить и тем, что Израиль просто воспользовался ситуацией, но любые совпадения они только частично совпадения...
🐱 Не споря с тем, что причины сирийского кризиса выходят далеко за рамки коварного плана американцев и израильтян, о чём я сам писал и говорил немало за эти дни, тем не менее, сложно опровергнуть факты. Сразу после начала переброски подразделений "Хизбаллы" из Ливана в Сирию Израиль начал наносить по ним воздушные удары, объясняя это неким пуском ракеты по территории Израиля со стороны "Хизбаллы". Конечно, это можно объяснить и тем, что Израиль просто воспользовался ситуацией, но любые совпадения они только частично совпадения...
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from ca