Эта женщина ходит по домам, просит деньги якобы на лечение сына. Сказала, что живёт в соседнем доме, но номер дома назвала неправильно. Пригрозила полицией, она сразу сбежала.
Касимовское шоссе , дом 57 корпусы 1,2,3. Ходила по всем подъездам.
Эта женщина ходит по домам, просит деньги якобы на лечение сына. Сказала, что живёт в соседнем доме, но номер дома назвала неправильно. Пригрозила полицией, она сразу сбежала.
Касимовское шоссе , дом 57 корпусы 1,2,3. Ходила по всем подъездам.
Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from ca
