Придумали меню и начали закупку "не трогай, это на новый год"?
Мы почти, а точнее собрали все полезное и выявили фаворитов: 🥪Закуски: бутеры с икрой (масло из формочек пряней), снеговики из моцареллы и черри (из видео), рождественский венок (рецепт) 📦Салаты: салат Оливье (рецепт), салат Селедка под шубой (рецепт), холодец (тут надеемся на помощь родителей) 🪺Горячее: - 🎄Десерт: думаем заказать/сделать кринжовый торт или обойтись мандаринами ☕️Напитки: глинтвейн (рецепты), кола и игристое
Придумали меню и начали закупку "не трогай, это на новый год"?
Мы почти, а точнее собрали все полезное и выявили фаворитов: 🥪Закуски: бутеры с икрой (масло из формочек пряней), снеговики из моцареллы и черри (из видео), рождественский венок (рецепт) 📦Салаты: салат Оливье (рецепт), салат Селедка под шубой (рецепт), холодец (тут надеемся на помощь родителей) 🪺Горячее: - 🎄Десерт: думаем заказать/сделать кринжовый торт или обойтись мандаринами ☕️Напитки: глинтвейн (рецепты), кола и игристое
The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from ca
