Нет-нет, вы не поняли, он может прям взять вашу фотку, подумать над ней и дорисовать, например, ход в крестиках-ноликах 😏
(функция доступна только доверенным бета-тестерам, полноценный релиз для всех в начале следующего года. У меня вот нет доступа, это скриншот из твиттера)
Нет-нет, вы не поняли, он может прям взять вашу фотку, подумать над ней и дорисовать, например, ход в крестиках-ноликах 😏
(функция доступна только доверенным бета-тестерам, полноценный релиз для всех в начале следующего года. У меня вот нет доступа, это скриншот из твиттера)
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from ca
