This is one of the reasons I keep social apps off my phone and only check periodically via desktop. If you are not conscious of what you consume, you WILL be consumed.
Your MIND is a battlefield…
If you don’t guard it, someone else—who does not have your best interest at heart—will claim it for themselves. CONTROL THE NARRATIVE, CONTROL THE FUTURE
CONTROL SEXUALITY, CONTROL CREATION
No nuclear war is necessary.
Why fight with physical weapons when you can seize control of the mind instead?
🔤by getting them all at the ROOT level 🔤rewire perception, reshape sexuality, redefine reality 🔤override their instincts so they willingly accept the programming
And what’s the easiest direct line to the collective subconscious?
🔤🔤🔤—especially men’s.
Because once you hack a man’s primal drive, you own his decision-making. Once you control his attraction template, you silently dictate his reality.
They are reformatting perception of sexuality at its most fundamental level, so future generations will never even question what was altered.
This is one of the reasons I keep social apps off my phone and only check periodically via desktop. If you are not conscious of what you consume, you WILL be consumed.
Your MIND is a battlefield…
If you don’t guard it, someone else—who does not have your best interest at heart—will claim it for themselves. CONTROL THE NARRATIVE, CONTROL THE FUTURE
CONTROL SEXUALITY, CONTROL CREATION
No nuclear war is necessary.
Why fight with physical weapons when you can seize control of the mind instead?
🔤by getting them all at the ROOT level 🔤rewire perception, reshape sexuality, redefine reality 🔤override their instincts so they willingly accept the programming
And what’s the easiest direct line to the collective subconscious?
🔤🔤🔤—especially men’s.
Because once you hack a man’s primal drive, you own his decision-making. Once you control his attraction template, you silently dictate his reality.
They are reformatting perception of sexuality at its most fundamental level, so future generations will never even question what was altered.
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from ca
