Олега Шеина исключили из СРЗП после признания «иноагентом»
«С 2022 года публичная риторика О.В. Шеина шла вразрез с деятельностью партии. Демонстрация им постоянной позиции осуждения и неприятия внешней политики нашего государства не поддерживалась руководством партии и активом регионального отделения партии», – цитируют партию «Ведомости».
Олега Шеина исключили из СРЗП после признания «иноагентом»
«С 2022 года публичная риторика О.В. Шеина шла вразрез с деятельностью партии. Демонстрация им постоянной позиции осуждения и неприятия внешней политики нашего государства не поддерживалась руководством партии и активом регионального отделения партии», – цитируют партию «Ведомости».
BY SOTA
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from ca
