00:05 Каково быть экстремистом и террористом? 01:50 Проект “Где я?” 07:15 Фестиваль в поддержку политзаключенных “Зона свободы” в Барселоне 12:15 Об артистах, которые молчат 14:00 О бывших коллегах, которые поддерживают войну 18:00 когда была пройдена точка невозврата? 22:55 Про деньги 24:20 Об ужасах войны и влиянии на психику 38:15 Про мотивацию россиян идти на войну 43:45 Про мотивацию в активизме
00:05 Каково быть экстремистом и террористом? 01:50 Проект “Где я?” 07:15 Фестиваль в поддержку политзаключенных “Зона свободы” в Барселоне 12:15 Об артистах, которые молчат 14:00 О бывших коллегах, которые поддерживают войну 18:00 когда была пройдена точка невозврата? 22:55 Про деньги 24:20 Об ужасах войны и влиянии на психику 38:15 Про мотивацию россиян идти на войну 43:45 Про мотивацию в активизме
Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said.
from ca
