⚠️⚠️⚠️ А это уже массовый ночной налет БПЛА ("мопедов") на Воронеж. Работает ПВО. Жители насчитали от 5 до 9 мощных взрывов. На видео на деревьях - обломки БПЛА. О жертвах и серьезных разрушениях не сообщается.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ А это уже массовый ночной налет БПЛА ("мопедов") на Воронеж. Работает ПВО. Жители насчитали от 5 до 9 мощных взрывов. На видео на деревьях - обломки БПЛА. О жертвах и серьезных разрушениях не сообщается.
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from ca