Политика "не беспокоить общество" в чем-то разумна и имеет свои плюсы. Но только если враг тоже настроен ваше общество не беспокоить. Ждать такого от врага немного странно, особенно если враг не имеет никаких моральных тормозов и начинает выдыхаться. Разумно ли давать врагу полный карт-бланш на то, чтобы беспокоить общество?
Политика "не беспокоить общество" в чем-то разумна и имеет свои плюсы. Но только если враг тоже настроен ваше общество не беспокоить. Ждать такого от врага немного странно, особенно если враг не имеет никаких моральных тормозов и начинает выдыхаться. Разумно ли давать врагу полный карт-бланш на то, чтобы беспокоить общество?
BY Орден Феникса
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from us
