🌿Яркий Травяной сбор, состоящий из листьев эвкалипта, мяты, пустырника и иван-чая, плодов можжевельника, листьев брусники, сосновых почек, шиповника, цветков липы и граната, ягод вишни и ежевики. Способствует укреплению иммунитета и облегчению дыхания. Особенно полезен при заболеваниях верхних дыхательных путей 🙏🏻 и очень вкусен сам по себе🫠
🌿Яркий Травяной сбор, состоящий из листьев эвкалипта, мяты, пустырника и иван-чая, плодов можжевельника, листьев брусники, сосновых почек, шиповника, цветков липы и граната, ягод вишни и ежевики. Способствует укреплению иммунитета и облегчению дыхания. Особенно полезен при заболеваниях верхних дыхательных путей 🙏🏻 и очень вкусен сам по себе🫠
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from us
