У меня сегодня сплошным потоком ромфант - в спектре от иронического до серьезной драмы: читая эпизод про очередной отбор невест студенток, поняла, что первый класс эффективной школы похож на этот отбор. Спускают клетку с троллем за семью замками (уровень задач🙈👀), надо его победить, зато сразу отсеивается половина претенденток. Кто там, наверху, тоже любит ромфант, как люблю его я?:)
У меня сегодня сплошным потоком ромфант - в спектре от иронического до серьезной драмы: читая эпизод про очередной отбор невест студенток, поняла, что первый класс эффективной школы похож на этот отбор. Спускают клетку с троллем за семью замками (уровень задач🙈👀), надо его победить, зато сразу отсеивается половина претенденток. Кто там, наверху, тоже любит ромфант, как люблю его я?:)
BY Книжный Проводник
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from us
