Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
BY Diet of Worms
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from cn
