Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 4137 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 8233 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 КОП | Telegram Webview: Naturecop/5865 -
Росприроднадзор взыщет с нефтекомпании-загрязнителя 5 млн природного ущерба
Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере природопользования пойдет в суд с иском о взыскании с ООО «Комсомольскнефть» природного ущерба, который компания причинила своей работой почве. Добровольно нефтяники делать этого не хотят.
Как сообщила сегодня глава Росприроднадзора Светлана Радионова, во время обследования законсервированных и ликвидированных буровых скважин на территории Ростовской области и Калмыкии инспекторы Службы выявили загрязнение почвы нефтепродуктами.
Концентрация загрязняющих веществ превысила предельно допустимую в 150 раз. Ущерб почвам составил более 5 млн рублей. Установлено, что на пострадавшем участке работает ООО «Комсомольскнефть».
«Компания отказалась возмещать вред добровольно. Добиваемся взыскания через суд», - написала Радионова в своем телеграм-канале.
Росприроднадзор взыщет с нефтекомпании-загрязнителя 5 млн природного ущерба
Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере природопользования пойдет в суд с иском о взыскании с ООО «Комсомольскнефть» природного ущерба, который компания причинила своей работой почве. Добровольно нефтяники делать этого не хотят.
Как сообщила сегодня глава Росприроднадзора Светлана Радионова, во время обследования законсервированных и ликвидированных буровых скважин на территории Ростовской области и Калмыкии инспекторы Службы выявили загрязнение почвы нефтепродуктами.
Концентрация загрязняющих веществ превысила предельно допустимую в 150 раз. Ущерб почвам составил более 5 млн рублей. Установлено, что на пострадавшем участке работает ООО «Комсомольскнефть».
«Компания отказалась возмещать вред добровольно. Добиваемся взыскания через суд», - написала Радионова в своем телеграм-канале.
BY КОП
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from cn