Владимир Осечкин о вынужденном "извинении" Путина и о том, почему диктатор вынужден признавать очевидное, а также о том, кому из российских чиновников и силовиков придётся отвечать и за атаку системой ПВО гражданского Embraer 190, и за унизительное положение самого диктатора на международной арене. Подробнее на Грэме https://youtu.be/KNM2p0xf5E8?si=NPKK3PSQwukOYKnV
Владимир Осечкин о вынужденном "извинении" Путина и о том, почему диктатор вынужден признавать очевидное, а также о том, кому из российских чиновников и силовиков придётся отвечать и за атаку системой ПВО гражданского Embraer 190, и за унизительное положение самого диктатора на международной арене. Подробнее на Грэме https://youtu.be/KNM2p0xf5E8?si=NPKK3PSQwukOYKnV
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted.
from cn
