Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/Stierlit_Z/-854" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">18й миссии</a> уже поступают на руки бойцам.<br/>Бойцы ВДВ на <a href="https://t.me/RVvoenkor/76877-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Мысли Штирлица 👤 | Telegram Webview: Stierlit_Z/893 -
Части сбора 18й миссии уже поступают на руки бойцам. Бойцы ВДВ на курском направлении благодарят: Инну "Помóрочку" (подсумки и Нефопам), Андрея "Лёлика" за турникеты, Олесю, Елену и Ирину за общий вклад в формирование миссии. От себя благодарю свою организацию за финансирование крупной закупки тактической медицины, которой укомплектованы аптечки бойцов! Всё для Победы! 🇷🇺🅉
Части сбора 18й миссии уже поступают на руки бойцам. Бойцы ВДВ на курском направлении благодарят: Инну "Помóрочку" (подсумки и Нефопам), Андрея "Лёлика" за турникеты, Олесю, Елену и Ирину за общий вклад в формирование миссии. От себя благодарю свою организацию за финансирование крупной закупки тактической медицины, которой укомплектованы аптечки бойцов! Всё для Победы! 🇷🇺🅉
Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from cn
