Поздравляем инструктора учебного центра УНИБОС, товарища Мотаню, с награждением от правительства Курской области и главы города Курчатов. Мотаня с октября бесплатно работает, как врач помогая госпиталю с потоком раненых и как Инструктор обучает тактической медицине необученных санинструкторов ВДВ. Большая благодарность ей за вклад в победу и всем Подписчикам канала за помощь в закупке медицинского имущества для отряда.
Поздравляем инструктора учебного центра УНИБОС, товарища Мотаню, с награждением от правительства Курской области и главы города Курчатов. Мотаня с октября бесплатно работает, как врач помогая госпиталю с потоком раненых и как Инструктор обучает тактической медицине необученных санинструкторов ВДВ. Большая благодарность ей за вклад в победу и всем Подписчикам канала за помощь в закупке медицинского имущества для отряда.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. Telegram was founded in 2013 by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from cn
