Забрёл сегодня на ростовскую набережную. Подошел к рыбакам поздороваться, узнать про клёв. 🎣
🐟 Слово за слово. Давно с ними не общался. Подзабыл конечно, что Ростовские рыбаки знают все, ну то есть вообще всё💯. И где на Богатяновке самогон лучше, и когда война кончится, и кто на американских выборах победит, и за своего донского губернатора конечно тоже знают.
👆Думаю, такие народные аналитические центры в любом городе России есть. Наливай да спрашивай. Никаких тебе chat GPT и искусственного интеллекта! Косой дядя Кеша, по прозвищу Циклоп, тебе и без ИИ все расскажет 😉
Забрёл сегодня на ростовскую набережную. Подошел к рыбакам поздороваться, узнать про клёв. 🎣
🐟 Слово за слово. Давно с ними не общался. Подзабыл конечно, что Ростовские рыбаки знают все, ну то есть вообще всё💯. И где на Богатяновке самогон лучше, и когда война кончится, и кто на американских выборах победит, и за своего донского губернатора конечно тоже знают.
👆Думаю, такие народные аналитические центры в любом городе России есть. Наливай да спрашивай. Никаких тебе chat GPT и искусственного интеллекта! Косой дядя Кеша, по прозвищу Циклоп, тебе и без ИИ все расскажет 😉
The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from cn
