💥Свежая подборка шевронов; еще 10 фото! 📌Это – 3️⃣3️⃣ выпуск.
🤔Точное количество шевронов, которые я вам уже показал, подсчету не подлежит. А вот отслеживать историю их появления и распространения в мире у нас прекрасно получается!
❓Как же тогда в нашей стране выглядели шевроны? Изделие было V-образной формы или в виде угольной нашивки из галуна, тесьмы или шнура. Шевроны именовались «нарукавный знак различия».
💥Свежая подборка шевронов; еще 10 фото! 📌Это – 3️⃣3️⃣ выпуск.
🤔Точное количество шевронов, которые я вам уже показал, подсчету не подлежит. А вот отслеживать историю их появления и распространения в мире у нас прекрасно получается!
❓Как же тогда в нашей стране выглядели шевроны? Изделие было V-образной формы или в виде угольной нашивки из галуна, тесьмы или шнура. Шевроны именовались «нарукавный знак различия».
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from cn
