🔰دوره های هفتگانه ICDL افراد جویای کار افراد جدیدالاستخدام تبدیل وضعیت نیروهای قراردادی و پیمانی به استخدام رسمی آتیه تلاشگران خلاق 💎جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر با شماره های زیر تماس حاصل فرمایید. ☎️۰۲۱-۶۵۲۵۶۲۱۶☎️ 📱۰۹۱۲۳۰۰۳۹۷۶📱 📱ins:atkhalagh_it📱 📱tlg:@atiecompany📱
🔰دوره های هفتگانه ICDL افراد جویای کار افراد جدیدالاستخدام تبدیل وضعیت نیروهای قراردادی و پیمانی به استخدام رسمی آتیه تلاشگران خلاق 💎جهت کسب اطلاعات بیشتر با شماره های زیر تماس حاصل فرمایید. ☎️۰۲۱-۶۵۲۵۶۲۱۶☎️ 📱۰۹۱۲۳۰۰۳۹۷۶📱 📱ins:atkhalagh_it📱 📱tlg:@atiecompany📱
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from cn
