🎙 #پادکست مناظره عبدالکریم سروش و ابوالقاسم علیدوست - قسمت اول
«شریعت و عقلانیت ۱: گستره فقه»
🔻 عبدالکریم سروش: توجه فقه به اخلاق محدود به ظاهر اعمال است. | از فقه نمی‌توان انتظار ساختن جامعه‌ای رستگار داشت. | چرا فقها خود را بی‌نیاز از علوم دیگر می‌دانند؟
🔻 ابوالقاسم علیدوست: در فقه گزاره غیراخلاقی نداریم. | پرسش انتظار دین از انسان مقدم است بر انتظار بشر از دین. | از فقیه نمی‌توان انتظار داشت عالم همه علوم باشد.
🎙 #پادکست مناظره عبدالکریم سروش و ابوالقاسم علیدوست - قسمت اول
«شریعت و عقلانیت ۱: گستره فقه»
🔻 عبدالکریم سروش: توجه فقه به اخلاق محدود به ظاهر اعمال است. | از فقه نمی‌توان انتظار ساختن جامعه‌ای رستگار داشت. | چرا فقها خود را بی‌نیاز از علوم دیگر می‌دانند؟
🔻 ابوالقاسم علیدوست: در فقه گزاره غیراخلاقی نداریم. | پرسش انتظار دین از انسان مقدم است بر انتظار بشر از دین. | از فقیه نمی‌توان انتظار داشت عالم همه علوم باشد.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Ukrainian forces successfully attacked Russian vehicles in the capital city of Kyiv thanks to a public tip made through the encrypted messaging app Telegram, Ukraine's top law-enforcement agency said on Tuesday. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours.
from cn
