Forwarded from Егоров щитпост (GiveShareBot - бот для розыгрышей)
Розыгрыш холста "ЕДИНЕНИЕ"
УСЛОВИЯ: 1. Быть подписанным на Егоров Щитпост 2. Сделать репост этого поста в свой канал/чат/группу/беседу и сделать скрин(скрин сохраняете, он нужен будет для подтверждения)
УСЛОВИЯ: 1. Быть подписанным на Егоров Щитпост 2. Сделать репост этого поста в свой канал/чат/группу/беседу и сделать скрин(скрин сохраняете, он нужен будет для подтверждения)
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals.
from cn
