Европы не будет за столом переговоров по украинскому конфликту, заявил спецпредставитель Трампа Кит Келлог. Ранее на этом настаивал Зеленский и сами главы европейских государств. Однако за столом переговоров будут только Украина, Россия и США в качестве посредника. «Философия США — остановить войну навсегда», — добавил Келлог. @bankrollo
Европы не будет за столом переговоров по украинскому конфликту, заявил спецпредставитель Трампа Кит Келлог. Ранее на этом настаивал Зеленский и сами главы европейских государств. Однако за столом переговоров будут только Украина, Россия и США в качестве посредника. «Философия США — остановить войну навсегда», — добавил Келлог. @bankrollo
BY Банки, деньги, два офшора
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from cn