Владимир Путин подписал указ о запрете пропаганды чайлдфри.
За пропаганду чайлдфри (отказа от деторождения) гражданам грозит штраф в размере до 100 тыс. рублей, должностным лицам — до 200 тыс. рублей, юридическим лицам — до 1 млн рублей либо административное приостановление деятельности на срок до 90 суток.
Если идею отказа от деторождения продвигают с помощью интернета, СМИ или пропаганда нацелена на детей, наказание становится строже. Максимальный штраф (в случае совпадения обоих обстоятельств) составит 400 тыс. рублей для граждан, 800 тыс. рублей для должностных лиц и 5 млн рублей для юрлиц. При этом под действие закона не будет подпадать распространение информации о монашестве.
Владимир Путин подписал указ о запрете пропаганды чайлдфри.
За пропаганду чайлдфри (отказа от деторождения) гражданам грозит штраф в размере до 100 тыс. рублей, должностным лицам — до 200 тыс. рублей, юридическим лицам — до 1 млн рублей либо административное приостановление деятельности на срок до 90 суток.
Если идею отказа от деторождения продвигают с помощью интернета, СМИ или пропаганда нацелена на детей, наказание становится строже. Максимальный штраф (в случае совпадения обоих обстоятельств) составит 400 тыс. рублей для граждан, 800 тыс. рублей для должностных лиц и 5 млн рублей для юрлиц. При этом под действие закона не будет подпадать распространение информации о монашестве.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from cn
