◾️🪖Сегодня под Красногоровкой (ДНР) погиб доброволец, оператор БПЛА и военкор «Миша на Донбассе»
«Мишка погиб сегодня в три утра под Красногоровкой в результате контратаки 79-й ОДШБр. Лучший в своём роде, можете не беспокоиться, у него осталось несколько классных детишек, так что так просто от него не избавиться», - сообщил военкор Алексей Смирнов.
Михаил Лучин отправился на СВО добровольцем из Москвы. Он командовал взводом БПЛА 5-й отдельной бригады имени Захарченко, или просто «Пятёрки», и воевал на Марьинском направлении.
◾️🪖Сегодня под Красногоровкой (ДНР) погиб доброволец, оператор БПЛА и военкор «Миша на Донбассе»
«Мишка погиб сегодня в три утра под Красногоровкой в результате контратаки 79-й ОДШБр. Лучший в своём роде, можете не беспокоиться, у него осталось несколько классных детишек, так что так просто от него не избавиться», - сообщил военкор Алексей Смирнов.
Михаил Лучин отправился на СВО добровольцем из Москвы. Он командовал взводом БПЛА 5-й отдельной бригады имени Захарченко, или просто «Пятёрки», и воевал на Марьинском направлении.
The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from cn
