От чому БПЦ (Базована Православна Церква) може зробити такий заклик, а ПЦУ і УПЦ до війни не могли? В чому проблема? Ладно, ПЦУ боїться, що якийсь умовний Майкл Щур тикне на них пальцем і промямлить набір слів, де можна буде розчути такі, як "мракобісся", "21-ше століття", "московська риторика". Але УПЦ чого боятися? Повна апатія до того, що відбувається у світі, якщо це не стосується їхнього майна і назви? Незрозуміло.
От чому БПЦ (Базована Православна Церква) може зробити такий заклик, а ПЦУ і УПЦ до війни не могли? В чому проблема? Ладно, ПЦУ боїться, що якийсь умовний Майкл Щур тикне на них пальцем і промямлить набір слів, де можна буде розчути такі, як "мракобісся", "21-ше століття", "московська риторика". Але УПЦ чого боятися? Повна апатія до того, що відбувається у світі, якщо це не стосується їхнього майна і назви? Незрозуміло.
BY ✙ Churcher ✙
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from cn
