Депутаты | Telegram Webview: deputaty/6844 -

Telegram Group & Telegram Channel

Депутаты

Forwarded from Оперативные сводки

Media is too big

VIEW IN TELEGRAM

Видео 18+

Город Новочеркасск Ростовской области. Мужчина вместе со своей спутницей стал делать замечания незнакомым молодым людям с символикой СВО на автомобиле. Затем сообщил, что военные ВС РФ, участвующие в спецоперации на Украине, это пушечное мясо.

И все бы ничего, если бы позже не выяснилось, что это был депутат городской Думы Новочеркасска Ростовской области от фракции «Единая Россия» Чайковский А.Н.

Депутат — слуга народа?

@opersvodki

www.group-telegram.com/cn/deputaty.com/6844

520 viewsMay 2, 2022 at 18:23

group-telegram.com/deputaty/6844

Create: 2022-05-02
Last Update: 2024-12-25 19:17:30

Видео 18+

Город Новочеркасск Ростовской области. Мужчина вместе со своей спутницей стал делать замечания незнакомым молодым людям с символикой СВО на автомобиле. Затем сообщил, что военные ВС РФ, участвующие в спецоперации на Украине, это пушечное мясо.

И все бы ничего, если бы позже не выяснилось, что это был депутат городской Думы Новочеркасска Ростовской области от фракции «Единая Россия» Чайковский А.Н.

Депутат — слуга народа?

@opersvodki

BY Депутаты

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/deputaty/6844

Open in Telegram

Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: 2024-12-25|

At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from cn

Telegram Депутаты
FROM American