Интрига в Бранденбурге. По первым подсчетам, Альтернатива уступает первое место социал-демократам. На третьем и четвертом местах Союз Сары В. и ХДС, Зеленые вылетают из ландтага. По первым данным возможна коалиция СДПГ и ХДС, а расчеты и первые прогнозы в моем материале тут 👉https://youtu.be/3fEfar_sduw?si=2MHXnuy-eIeB3v9G
Интрига в Бранденбурге. По первым подсчетам, Альтернатива уступает первое место социал-демократам. На третьем и четвертом местах Союз Сары В. и ХДС, Зеленые вылетают из ландтага. По первым данным возможна коалиция СДПГ и ХДС, а расчеты и первые прогнозы в моем материале тут 👉https://youtu.be/3fEfar_sduw?si=2MHXnuy-eIeB3v9G
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices.
from cn