Гражданин Шимов, лучше поясни нам, как это с такой принципиальностью к недружественной Литве ты свободно в Вильнюс катаешься? Лукашисты вот практически все под санкциями и невъездные, а "западнорус" спокойно в Вильне кувыркается. А не завербован ли ты там часом?
Гражданин Шимов, лучше поясни нам, как это с такой принципиальностью к недружественной Литве ты свободно в Вильнюс катаешься? Лукашисты вот практически все под санкциями и невъездные, а "западнорус" спокойно в Вильне кувыркается. А не завербован ли ты там часом?
Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from cn
