Обе пары, кстати, с утеплителем. Первые поменьше, вторые побольше. Вторые мы носили даже сейчас с теплым шерстяным носком. По совету тех же бывалых, брала на 1 см побольше, чтобы еще хватило на осень. 🤱
Что, собственно, в них классного, особенно для первых шагов: 💜Широкий круглый нос 💜Гибкая подошва 💜Высокий подъем и молния для удобства 💜Легкие по весу
Обе пары, кстати, с утеплителем. Первые поменьше, вторые побольше. Вторые мы носили даже сейчас с теплым шерстяным носком. По совету тех же бывалых, брала на 1 см побольше, чтобы еще хватило на осень. 🤱
Что, собственно, в них классного, особенно для первых шагов: 💜Широкий круглый нос 💜Гибкая подошва 💜Высокий подъем и молния для удобства 💜Легкие по весу
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market.
from cn
