Бабрята, конечно, молодцы, что раскрутили дело депутата гордумы Иркутска Алексея Кудрявцева. Правда, как всегда, смотрят по верхам. Мы бы советовали копнуть поглубже - лет на пятнадцать назад.
Про то, как молодой Алексей, любитель сноубордов и вечеринок, в городе Байкальске бил в припадке агрессии девочку головой о батарею. Про попытку изнасилования. Про незаконный оборот веществ. Про то, почему депутат отказался пройти тест на наркотики. И про то, кто и как его от всего этого отмазал. Увлекательная история.
Про отношения Бутакова с "Николаем" - не интересно.
Бабрята, конечно, молодцы, что раскрутили дело депутата гордумы Иркутска Алексея Кудрявцева. Правда, как всегда, смотрят по верхам. Мы бы советовали копнуть поглубже - лет на пятнадцать назад.
Про то, как молодой Алексей, любитель сноубордов и вечеринок, в городе Байкальске бил в припадке агрессии девочку головой о батарею. Про попытку изнасилования. Про незаконный оборот веществ. Про то, почему депутат отказался пройти тест на наркотики. И про то, кто и как его от всего этого отмазал. Увлекательная история.
Про отношения Бутакова с "Николаем" - не интересно.
I'm in a lot of trouble, Daisy.
BY Иркутский дзынь
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government.
from cn
