Всё, теперь можно по 40 минут проводить в ванне, потому что Лёва обожает мазаться всякими штучками. Я еще недавно ему скраб купила, где абразив не Сахар и соль, а кокосовая стружка и пенки от YESBABY он обожает 😊 Когда не знаешь, чем занять его в 6 часовое бодрствование в однушке- ванна просто спасение! 🛁
Всё, теперь можно по 40 минут проводить в ванне, потому что Лёва обожает мазаться всякими штучками. Я еще недавно ему скраб купила, где абразив не Сахар и соль, а кокосовая стружка и пенки от YESBABY он обожает 😊 Когда не знаешь, чем занять его в 6 часовое бодрствование в однушке- ванна просто спасение! 🛁
Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from cn