Staatliche Einflussnahme auf freie Wahlen würden normalerweise für Aufschrei sorgen. Zurecht! Warum stört es hierzulande anscheinend keinen „Demokraten“, wenn das grün geführte Bundesfamilienministerium über eine „Nichtregierungsorganisation“ Steuermittel an alle Landtagskandidaten verteilt, um der einzigen Oppositionspartei des Landes zu schaden?
Staatliche Einflussnahme auf freie Wahlen würden normalerweise für Aufschrei sorgen. Zurecht! Warum stört es hierzulande anscheinend keinen „Demokraten“, wenn das grün geführte Bundesfamilienministerium über eine „Nichtregierungsorganisation“ Steuermittel an alle Landtagskandidaten verteilt, um der einzigen Oppositionspartei des Landes zu schaden?
BY Lars Hünich Der Bunte Pullunder
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Friday’s performance was part of a larger shift. For the week, the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq fell 2%, 2.9%, and 3.5%, respectively. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from cn
