В канун Нового года заглянули на интервью к нашему доброму знакомому, переселенцу из Дании и блогеру Ларсу Агербак-Гребневу.
Ларс не только преподаëт английский язык в Гостовской школе Шабалинского района Кировской области, но ещё и ведëт свой канал о жизни в России с аудиторией в 250К подписчиков. Впечатляет, не так ли?
В канун Нового года заглянули на интервью к нашему доброму знакомому, переселенцу из Дании и блогеру Ларсу Агербак-Гребневу.
Ларс не только преподаëт английский язык в Гостовской школе Шабалинского района Кировской области, но ещё и ведëт свой канал о жизни в России с аудиторией в 250К подписчиков. Впечатляет, не так ли?
He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from cn
