Я думаю то вже не треба виправдовуватись, шо я жах який пасивний художник. Але саме цьому є маленьке виправдання. В мене нема часу😿 Розписувати не буду, бо я впевнена ви і самі то відчуваєте. Якось так живем. До нового року надіюсь шось, все таки, зліпити, бо якось ну…
Я думаю то вже не треба виправдовуватись, шо я жах який пасивний художник. Але саме цьому є маленьке виправдання. В мене нема часу😿 Розписувати не буду, бо я впевнена ви і самі то відчуваєте. Якось так живем. До нового року надіюсь шось, все таки, зліпити, бо якось ну…
BY кавова майстерня | #украрт
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from cn
